Next: 4. Required model outputs
Up: 3. Proposed FASTEX cases
Previous: 3.1 IOP 11/LOW 30
This system is proposed as a case study primarily because it has received attention from CETP and JCMM in the past years.
It was very successfully surveyed by two aircrafts.
This perturbation was associated to a fast moving, rapidly deepening, secondary frontal wave, which unusually intensified in the eastern part of the North Atlantic.
A very nice feature of this IOP is that the low was actually forming during the MSA mission.
The clouds were initially confined to the baroclinic jet-stream, and evolved into a cyclonic cloud-head.
A few hours after the MSA flights, Low 39 underwent a rapid development, accompanied with an amplification of vorticity of 2.1 in 18 hours.
The following figures give a brief summary of IOP 16.
Figure 7:
IOP 16: METEOSAT infrared images (left) and ARPEGE MSLP and 2 meter-T fields (right) for for 970216 at 18hUTC (top), 970217 at 12hUTC (middle), and 970217 at 18hUTC (bottom).
|
Figure 8:
IOP 16: Available FASTEX observations.
|
The following pictures display cloud related fields, either simulated by the operational model ARPEGE, or retrieved from satellites observations, on 970217 at 12hUTC.
Figure 9:
IOP 16: Composite infrared satellite image from 970217 at 12hUTC.
|
Figure 10:
IOP 16: Outgoing longwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere (W/m2), from the ARPEGE operational 12-hour forecast, on 970217 at 12hUTC.
|
Figure 11:
IOP 16: SSM/I composite liquid water content (g/m2) on 970217 around 12hUTC (from NASA/MSFC DAAC).
|
Figure 12:
IOP 16: SSM/I composite water vapor content (kg/m2) on 970217 around 12hUTC (from NASA/MSFC DAAC).
|
Next: 4. Required model outputs
Up: 3. Proposed FASTEX cases
Previous: 3.1 IOP 11/LOW 30
Philippe LOPEZ
1998-11-16