MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, 1998

between the National (Hydro)Meteorological Services of

Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Moldavia, Morocco, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia , and Slovenia

concerning the Limited Area Spectral Numerical Weather Prediction System

named «ALADIN» (short for ARPEGE(IFS)/ALADIN), valid for four years after its initial signing by eleven of the Partners in Paris on 25/11/96

updated version, adopted at the third Assembly of Partners in Prague on 6/11/98

1. Preamble

2. Current principles guiding R&D and maintenance of ALADIN (more precisely ARPEGE(IFS)/ALADIN to recall the deep interdependency of the two systems)

3. Identification of the object of the MoU

4. Conditions of use of the ALADIN software

5. Conditions of membership to the ALADIN Project:

6. Conditions of adhesion to the ALADIN project

7. Conditions of withdrawal from the ALADIN project

8. Amendment procedure of the present MoU

9. Arbitration Clause


Signatures


Appendix A

Appendix B : Participation in the ALADIN Project at 30th September 1996 & at 30th September 1998

Appendix C : Commitment and monitoring of manpower associated to the ALADIN Project

Appendix D : Conditions for additional data and products according to the Resolution 40 (WMO Cg-XII) Generic Wording

Appendix E : Agreement between ECMWF & Météo-France for the access and the use of the jointly developed and maintened NWP software "IFS/ARPEGE"


1. Preamble

The ALADIN project was launched back in November 1990 when Météo-France proposed to six National (Hydro)Meteorological Services (NMSs) of Central and Eastern Europe to jointly develop, improve and maintain a Limited Area version of the ARPEGE(IFS) global Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) software.

In September 1991 the effective work started with the participation of seven NMSs (Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Poland and Romania). In November 1993 three new Partners joined in (Morocco, Slovakia and Slovenia) and in April 1995 two other Partners completed the team (Croatia and Spain). Belgium and Moldavia were entering the project at the time of signing of the initial MoU. Partners already participating in the project or admitted into it at that time and having technical problems for an immediate signing of the MoU (Moldavia, Morocco and Spain) had six months to regularise their situation, time during which they were not submitted to the selection procedure mentioned later in Section 6. Spain finally decided to withdraw from the project and only Moldavia and Morocco regularised their signing. Portugal, that was candidate to enter the project at the time of signing of the initial MoU, was regularly admitted in April 1997. Hence, this updated version has been unanimously approved by fourteen Partners.

Despite the fact that operational aims could not be exactly the same for all Partners, the informal agreement that helped to maintain a successful dynamics for the project did not need updating or revision for the five years before the initial signing of the MoU.

At that time several evolutions made it necessary to get a minimum of formalisation around the project. Let it immediately be clarified that this formalisation was not aimed at modifying the principles that had successfully been obeyed up to then but at creating a protecting environment for their further application.

The reasons that were pleading for the signing of a MoU (and are still fully valid) were the following:

However this MoU is not dealing with such technical aspects like computing resources and telecommunications, since it is thought that those cannot be dealt with at the level of all ALADIN Partners.

All other questions raised by the application of this MoU (and more generally the maintenance of the momentum and the preservation of the spirit of the project) are treated by an «Assembly of Partners» (the difference to a Council being that this Assembly has to tackle directly -i.e. without Committees- all types of problems linked to its duties) that meets at yearly intervals in one of the Partners country. The composition of this Assembly may depend on the problems to be tackled at one given meeting, but delegates need to be entrusted by their Directions for their participation. Extraordinary meetings may be conveyed under unanimous agreement of the Partners.

The main tasks of the «Assembly of Partners» are:

In particular, the second Assembly of Partners in Brussels on 5/12/97 agreed that all rules concerning the exchange and possible sell of ALADIN numerical products are superseded by humanitarian considerations in case of emergency situations (like the Central European flooding of July 97 or the forest fire consequences around Indonesia in fall 97), this remaining true only for a limited period of time.

Météo-France assumes free of charge the Secretariat outside the meetings of the «Assembly of Partners», through provision of the necessary manpower for accomplishing the actions linked to the existence of this MoU and to the decisions of the Assembly.


2. Current principles guiding R&D and maintenance of ALADIN (more precisely ARPEGE(IFS)/ALADIN to recall the deep interdependency of the two systems)


3. Identification of the object of the MoU

In order to facilitate the definition of the ALADIN system, the relevant software encompasses (i) for access and protection rules, the union of the IFS/ARPEGE and ALADIN libraries at all existing Cycles and (ii) for use rules, the strict limitation of the former to the parts necessary to run existing ALADIN configurations (1, 701, 923 and 927 from the operational point of view at the time of the signing of the updated version of the MoU). While the applications based on this second definition of the software may have different names, the main body (code, system or model) must always be referred to as «ALADIN».


4. Conditions of use of the ALADIN software


5. Conditions of membership to the ALADIN Project:

Each of the undersigned parties to this Memorandum of Understanding hereby agrees:


6. Conditions of adhesion to the ALADIN project

The above-mentioned principles and the «ALADIN spirit» are clearly against making the ALADIN project a «closed membership club». On the other hand, the project has reached a status (the one that made this MoU necessary) that forbids that entry to the «club» could depend only on the willingness of the newcomer to do so. In particular, if there exist shared application ventures or shared research actions between some Partners (like currently in the RC-LACE and SELAM cases) no third party will be allowed to join these shared ventures or actions before having been accepted as a new ALADIN Partner. Furthermore, the application of the appended «E» software agreement between ECMWF and Météo-France about IFS/ARPEGE and the need to have an equal access of all ALADIN Partners to the software used for R&D and/or operations inside the ALADIN project, make it necessary to get ECMWF's agreement (that would not be unreasonably withheld and that might depend on a decision by the ECMWF Council) for any further adhesion.

Hence the undersigned Partners agree to fix the following adhesion rules:


7. Conditions of withdrawal from the ALADIN project

The spirit of the ALADIN project also forbids to impose any membership. On the other hand, signing of the present MoU, by current and future Partners, represents a commitment which fulfilment has to be somehow verified.

Hence the undersigned Partners agree to fix the following withdrawal rules:


8. Amendment procedure of the present MoU

The present MoU may be amended following the proposal of one (or several) Partner(s), under the condition of unanimous acceptance of the amendment by the other Partners and provided that the amendments do not contradict the appended «E» IFS/ARPEGE software agreement between ECMWF and Météo-France.

9. Arbitration Clause

All disputes or differences arising out or in connection with the present agreement shall, failing any agreement to settle it amicably concluded by all parties within thirty days from the receipt of a registered letter by the plaintiff to the other parties, be finally settled under the Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce by one sole arbitrator appointed in accordance with the said Rules.

The place of arbitration shall be Paris and the French procedure law on international arbitration shall apply.

The arbitrator may rule as "amiable compositeur".






 Home