Checking and validation of BATOS data on board FASTEX ships
General information
checking and validation provided by METEO FRANCE / CNRM / GMEI /4M
experiment: FASTEX
ship name | ship call sign | BATOS data | on board staff observations |
from | to | from | to |
VICTOR BUGAEV (Ukraine) | EOGW | 01 January 1997, 00UTC | 01 March 1997, 00UTC | 05 January 1997, 00UTC | 01 March 1997, 00UTC |
R/V Le SUROIT (France) | FZVN | from 07 January 1997, 17UTC | 28 February 1997, 23UTC | 01 January 1997, 09UTC | 28 February 1997, 21UTC |
Ægir (Iceland) | TFTA | 05 January 1997, 21UTC | 22 February 1997, 11UTC | 05 January 1997,21UTC | 22 February 1997, 09UTC |
Quality control processing:
BATOS data were compared with the on board instrumentation data (named 'operator' data afterwards).
For each available parameter, automatic BATOS data and operator measurements were plotted and compared together.
In particular, each time the difference BATOS and 'operator' values was greater than a given value, data were visually examinated.
It led to point out suspect data which were manually checked and flagged if necessary.
In conclusion, when available and of good quality (flag set to 'good'), BATOS data will be considered as reference data and have to be used rather than 'operator' data. In the other cases, free hand is given to the data user.
Top of page
Remarks on VICTOR BUGAEV data
Top of page
Remarks on the R/V Le SUROIT data
Top of page
Remarks on the Ægir data
General comments on BATOS missing data:
As reported on the Ægir log, a lot of interventions were made on the
BATOS software. This was a great problem for BATOS, which couldn't stock values
needed to compute averaged data, nether send messages on the GTS.
After the 11 February, 9UTC, 'operator' observations are still every
3 hours, but BATOS data are available every hour (after a change in the
BATOS software, asked by METEO-FRANCE/CNRM/GMEI/4M to the staff).
No more intervention appeared on the log, recorded data are correct.
pressure measurements
Between the 13 January and the 18 January, a problem occured on the
BATOS pressure instrumentation. Data concerned by this problem were removed.
temperature measurements
Differences are sometimes large between the two data sets (BATOS and 'operator'), but data seem to be consistent, refering
to the temporal evolution of each parameter.
During the period 7 Jan, 12UTC to 13 January, 12UTC, differences can be explained by very calm winds.
humidity measurements
No 'operator' data for this parameter.
wind direction and speed measurements
Nothing in particular to report.
Top of page
Miscellaneous information:
Victor BUGAEV:
Significant differences between BATOS and 'operator' pressures ,
temperatures ,
humidities .
R/V Le SUROIT:
Significant differences between BATOS and 'operator' pressures ,
temperatures ,
humidities ,
wind directions and
wind speeds .
Missing data summary statement .
The AEGIR:
Significant differences between BATOS and 'operator' pressures ,
temperatures ,
wind directions and
wind speeds .
Missing data summary statement .
Top of page
Updated: 22 April 1999